The distrust of artificial intelligence extends even to The Matrix film series, where even The Merovingian character harbors suspicions about A.I.

Advertisment

The concern over the use of artificial intelligence in the creative industry has become a major point of contention for members of both the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and the Screen Actors Guild‐American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA). The fear is that AI could be used to either replace the work of artists entirely or generate digital performances by utilizing data from human actors’ faces or voices. Recently, a background actor involved in the production of WandaVision revealed that she was scanned without explanation and paid only $187. This incident has raised concerns that AI might eliminate the need for background performers altogether. However, worries like these have been lingering in the industry for quite some time. Lambert Wilson, known for his role as The Merovingian in The Matrix series, recently shared his personal experience regarding AI utilization. During the production of the video game Enter The Matrix, motion capture professionals spent a day capturing Wilson’s expressions and recording his voice, raising questions about the potential misuse of his likeness in the digital realm. Wilson warns that this technology, which is over two decades old, has only become more advanced over time. Although he is not a US citizen and not directly involved in the strike, Wilson stands in solidarity with US actors fighting against such threats. He believes that they are engaged in a battle for the preservation of civilization, and the outcome will not only determine the future of cinema but also shape our overall destiny. These concerns emphasize the importance of the ongoing strike, debunking the notion that it is merely a demand for more money by wealthy individuals. It is a test to gauge our tolerance as a society toward the advent of artificial intelligence. If we accept AI’s role in replacing artists, critics, journalists, or anyone else solely to further enrich those who are already financially privileged, then we are in grave danger. This is not an exaggeration; it is a matter of utmost significance. When an actor who played an antagonistic computer program raises alarm bells about the potential malevolent applications of such technology, it is imperative that we pay attention and take these concerns seriously.

Advertisment